Home  Tar measurement protocol  Results from the project



 Background information
 Project objectives
 Description of work
 Project status
 Partners

Background

Major bottleneck in biomass gasification: tar
Gasification technologies are expected to play a key role in expanding the use of biomass as a major renewable energy source. Gasification processes, converting the solid biomass feedstock into a gaseous fuel (or syngas), significantly broaden the biomass utilisation spectrum. The syngas can be used for, e.g., co-firing in coal-fired power plants, electricity generation in stand-alone conversion devices (gas engines, gas turbines, fuel cells), and production of gaseous/liquid fuels or chemicals. These applications set different specifications for (the contaminant levels in) the syngas.

Organic contaminants or 'tars' are considered as the major problem-causing contaminants, which causes a large obstacle for the market introduction of biomass-gasification based systems. Moreover, measurement methods as well as definitions for tars are numerous and non-consistent. As a result, the comparison of data and the definition of clear maximum allowable concentrations for tars in the syngas are still problematic.

Need for tar measurement standardisation
In general, proper measurement of contaminant levels in biomass gasification-based systems is crucial to their optimisation and implementation. For most contaminants, well-developed measurement techniques exist which are similar to techniques used for related technologies, such as coal combustion and coal gasification (e.g., for dust, alkali metals, alkaline gases, etc). They allow, e.g., for an undisputable determination of contaminant levels in the raw syngas, and of required gas cleaning performance and clean syngas quality. For tars this is not the case and the different sampling and analysis methods currently being used cause a lot of confusion. This confusion is even increased by disputes on the definition of tar.

The absence of a well-defined and widely accepted tar measurement method hinders the market introduction of biomass gasification-based systems in the following ways:

  1. It makes it difficult to come to a clear identification and definition of tar-induced problems. As a consequence, also finding proper solutions to these problems becomes more difficult.
  2. It is difficult to define clear specifications for individual system components (e.g., syngas cooler, gas cleaning equipment, prime mover), which complicates/frustrates the communication between different suppliers for these components. Tolerances from which guarantees on performance, system lifetime etc. can be derived, are difficult to define.
  3. It is difficult to design optimised integral biomass gasification systems based on an optimal selection of system components.

The poor status concerning tar measurement in biomass gasification syngas was clearly illustrated by a parallel measurement study, in which several institutes conducted tar measurements at the same time and location [1].

Therefore, building on initial work started at a joint IEA/USDoE/EU-DGXVII meeting in Brussels in 1998 and resulting in two draft protocols presented at the 10th European Biomass Conference in Würzburg, the development of a uniform Protocol (later called Guideline) was started in an EU project with the title: "Development of a standard method (Protocol) for the measurement of organic contaminants (tars) in biomass producer gasses" (contract ERK6-1999-20002). Partners in this project were: ECN (co-ordinator), BTG, Danish Technical Institute – Denmark (DTI), Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan – Sweden (KTI), Verenum – Switserland, VTT – Finland, and CRE Group Ltd (renamed to EMC Environmental Engineering Ltd) – United Kingdom. In addition, the project involved a group of (industrial) reviewers.

This project resulted in a Tar measurement Guideline, which was largely based on R&D activities in several parallel (mostly national) projects. For information on the results of the project, click here...

"Tar Guideline" measurement method